Background on “Swell with Bikini Dancing Girls”

There are different ways of making new art. To me this means to make a new image, something that doesn’t already exist, or isn’t just a variation on an overused theme. Many artists accomplish this by not doing it at all, but making some other sort of art that isn’t an image (conceptual art…). But to me, the image is the core of visual art, and making a new image is the central challenge. This can be attempted in a number of ways, including through style, mediums, method, and subject matter. In this image I was trying to incorporate subject matter I hadn’t seen rendered in a fine art context, which I also did in a style that requires computer skills and traditional skills.

About the technique:

As I mentioned yesterday, no I didn’t just take a photo and slap some cheese-ball Photoshop filter over it. Personally, I think those filters look unconvincing, and once you catch on to what they look like, the mind dismisses the effect as technological gimcrackery. On the other hand, those who categorically dismiss art done on the computer focus too much on material, and too little on vision. Surely, if Leonardo da Vinci were alive, he wouldn’t turn up his nose at new avenues of image making, and insist on comparatively barbaric tools.

If I just used a single photo, it would look something like the following, which is a screen shot of the dancing girl in the forefront. Aside from having a giant logo on it from the website of whoever shot the video, the sky is a bit grey, her feet are cut off, and it’s not an interesting composition. Notice, if you scroll back up, that I put feet back in, changed the color of the bikini, added hair for movement, and completely changed her left arm. What I particularly liked, incidentally, was her right hand, which seemed to claw at the air.

girl-foreground

Screen capture I used for the dancing girl in the foreground.

If I had used just a single photo and applied a cheese-ball Photoshop “oil paint” filter, I would have gotten what you see below.

with-oil-filter

Here it is with Photoshop’s “oil paint” filter. Looks more like a drab quilt than a painting.

To my eye, the above image doesn’t look very good, and definitely looks like someone just played around with filters. Compare a section of my final image with the easy technique of applying Photoshop filters to a single image.

animation-comparison

Animation comparing my final image to the result of what I imagine people might think was the technique I used.

About the content/meaning:

Yes, I wanted to lure people in with bikini babes striking poses. It can be frustrating when any snap of a babe gets hundreds of times more hits than ones best art. But don’t be fooled by the “beach bunnies”, because as soon as one notices the giant, looming wave, one might realize it’s more complex than it at first appeared. You might take time to notice the 3 shadows, which add their own perspectival dimension to the image, as does the yellow and black striped tape. The easy conclusion that this is a just a sexist photo of girls is belied by there being women in the audience (in which case the omnipresent “male gaze” is also conspicuously the “female gaze”), by the girls dancing as if doing so empowered them, and more importantly by the painterly strokes that remind us we are just looking at pigment or pixels, and no real women are involved. I find particularly interesting that people focus on the girls to the extent of missing, or sidelining that there is an enormous wave barreling down on them, and everyone in the picture is likely about to die, or at least have the swim of their lives. By the way, a giant wave was a recurrent nightmare I had as a kid.

The piece is largely about contemporary popular culture, and internet culture in particular. This has “YouTube” written all over it, and is more a comment or reflection on the window of that culture than on gender roles, the objectification of women, women’s expression of sexuality, or any of those other sorts of politicized issues, though they are all there. The wave for me is the omnipresent threat of global warming, and the college kids at Spring Break are reveling in their independence while the future looks ominous. I’m not faulting or criticizing them – they are entitled to fun – but I am putting it in the context of the time in which we live, and the peril we face. The wave tells us there’s definitely something wrong, even while the vacationing students are exulting in nature, which the deep blue sky and clouds accentuate.

The viewer is positioned as a privileged member of the audience, who can also see the wave that most of them are not facing. The hand at the right reaches out to the girl whose booty takes up a good amount of the real estate of the canvas, but we don’t know if the hand (male or female) is reaching to warn, touch, or try to remove the girl’s top. From our vantage point, we’d better run for our lives. Do we try to alert everyone first, or just scram so as not to get trampled? This is split decision emergency time, so, you can’t just keep checking out the girls.

In the picture below notice how small the men with the umbrella are in comparison to the wave. They also look like they figured out they were in trouble.

tsunami

You probably wanna run

The complete image, again, below.

Swell-with-Bikini-Dancing-Girls

Swell with Bikini Dancing Girls, digital image, by me [3/2014]

~ Ends


Photography Prints


Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Background on “Swell with Bikini Dancing Girls”

  1. Enjoyed reading your explanation, and the term “internet culture!” Brilliant. This is actually something that is real now, and I don’t think anyone is doing art on a culture that we are currently creating.

    Like

    1. Thanks. I got the idea from the icons people use for their Youtube videos. Almost every prank or fail video/compilation will choose a sexual picture of a girl from a frame in a video, if they have one. I gather it will then get the most clicks, which means the most money, because those types of videos get thousands and even millions of views. However, there’s a problem with it. In this case if one thinks of the image as a Youtube video “fail” it makes sense, and makes sense of a critique of the mentality of the thumbs they put on the those videos, and the culture at large.

      Like

  2. As the maker of a few sexy videos that ended up on YouTube with millions of views, I get what you mean in your explanation, and in your frustration–however, I also love the sense of foreboding and manic sexiness in this painting. It’s great. I actually have a BFA and MFA in art and love making films for youtube. I’d say, yeah, 99.9 percent of what’s on Youtube is just awful, but doesn’t the same percentage apply to the contemporary art scene?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s